Many a debate are raging on reservations for Dalits (lower caste) in higher
education in India. This is in light of recent tragic cases of suicides of
Dalit students, on account of alleged discrimination. To lose lives to
discrimination is testimonial to how we refuse to learn, adopt and apply an
appropriate value system that puts value to life over other trivial issues. I
began to think this through to gain clarity for myself on what may be a
solution at least to the dilemma of reservation in higher or other education
systems.
The primary questions, for me, in this are:
1) Should there be reservations on the basis of caste and/or
economic criteria?
2) Should there be reservations at all?
3) Where should there be reservations, if at all?
My thoughts on the subject are:
Firstly in a country where universal
primary and secondary education are being promoted and considered a fundamental right, the
real question that is then being asked is not about broad inclusion to such educational
opportunities, but access to premier education institutions. The problem
therefore is about quality of educational institutions and not the basis of
admission. Importantly, if in the school education system anyone is
discriminating against anyone on any basis, then there is a problem and the need for
eliminating this bias. Therefore, any form of reservation herein is unacceptable.
This, thus, also means that we need to ensure prevention of discrimination
rather than creating a case for reservations. So the question to focus on is, how do we ensure an equitable, transparent and unbiased process of admission
and have checks on any form of discrimination thereafter. To me this does not
seem as big a problem, especially in today’s world where technology and an
aware populous can be leveraged towards creating this system. It also requires
a grievance registration and addressing system to be put in place and monitored.
Once students have got similar education at the school level, is
there a need for further support? I
personally don’t think so. There may be a case for providing loans to
economically disadvantaged people, but not a case for reservations. Again, this
presupposes transparent, unbiased and merit based admissions, to avoid
discrimination. Of course, if we take a somewhat visionary view of education,
there is a further debate to be had whether even merit should be the case for
limiting the aspiration of those who want to access higher education.
In the
case of limited capacity, that is the problem that should be addressed.
If the
aspirant has not gained minimum required eligibility in terms of skills,
knowledge or experience to cope with requirements of the course, then they
should have pathways to acquire those and then pursue their academic interests.
Of course this requires to establish the minimum requirement for eligibility
and validity of this criteria. Given our school education, its examination
system and the variation in the quality of these institutions, there may be a
case for validating the credentials of the students independently based
strictly on the essential eligibility criteria required for pursuing further or higher education in the chosen discipline. Where possible, aspirants should be
provided with remedial and supplementary options to make up shortcomings and
gain eligibility.
I think the bottom-line for me is that we have to focus on the
following instead of reservations:
- Increase
capacity to meet demand.
- Ensure there is
no discrimination in admission and other educational processes.
- Steadily
increase the quality of education across the board and not merely promote
and create categories within education institutions.
- Provide a
remedial education system to help weaker students make up to the required
eligibility criteria of the course, this should be standardised across the
country as a National Eligibility Criteria for these qualifications. This
would be something akin to National Occupational Standards in the TVET
(Technical and Vocational Education & Training) system align to the
National TVET/Skills Qualifications Framework.
For any of these to happen we need to increase funding allocated
to education at all levels and this money has to be spent intelligently on
aspects that truly enhances quality. This includes mostly on engaging those who
have the correct value set and competence to develop and deliver such
education.
Whether such a vision of the future is practical or not can be
argued at no end, but it is my opinion that to delineate, conceptualise and
define the ideal possible scenario and the underpinning principles is critical
to engender and manifest the possibility itself.